§ 00
Statement

Every conclusion is a compression of reality.

Plankton reconstructs the assumptions, evidence, constraints and unknowns hidden inside that compression before decisions are made.

Reality exists independently of us, and our access to it is always incomplete. Nobody acts on reality; everybody acts on their understanding of it.

Plankton exists to improve that understanding, not to claim certainty.

§ 01
Definition

What is Plankton?

Plankton is a constitutional framework for structured interrogation.

It reconstructs the assumptions, evidence, trade-offs, contradictions, constraints and unknowns that compression removes.

Plankton does not decide, and does not claim certainty.

Plankton produces the best-supported understanding available today, with its unknowns stated, so that decisions rest on something that can be examined.

The constitution and the cycle derived from it are documented, versioned and open to challenge. See the methodology.

§ 02
Philosophy

Nobody acts on reality. Everybody acts on their understanding of it.

Plankton exists to improve that understanding by interrogating evidence, assumptions, uncertainty and alternative explanations.

F1
Reality
  • Reality exists independently of us.
  • Our access to reality is always incomplete.
  • Every observation, document, opinion, product, policy and decision represents an interpretation rather than reality itself.
  • Plankton exists to improve our understanding of reality by reconstructing the assumptions, evidence, constraints, uncertainty and alternative explanations hidden inside every conclusion.
F2
Understanding
  • We do not possess reality.
  • We possess our understanding of reality.
  • Understanding is never complete.
  • It develops through observation, interrogation, contradiction and revision.
  • Every conclusion represents the best-supported understanding available at that moment.
F3
Evidence
  • Evidence increases confidence.
  • It does not eliminate uncertainty.
  • Confidence should never exceed the available evidence.
  • The quality of a conclusion depends upon the quality of the evidence supporting it.
F4
Uncertainty
  • Unknowns are expected.
  • They are not weaknesses.
  • They should be identified, measured and communicated rather than concealed.
  • Plankton makes uncertainty explicit.
F5
Revision
  • Better evidence should produce better understanding.
  • Changing conclusions is evidence of learning rather than failure.
  • Every interrogation remains open to future revision.
§ 03
Cycle

The interrogation cycle.

The cycle begins and ends with compression. The difference is that the second compression carries its interrogation with it, and is revised as better evidence emerges.

§ 04
Constitution

The Plankton Constitution

The following articles govern every interrogation. They are not preferences. They are the conditions under which an understanding is fit to inform a decision.

A1

Reality

  • Reality exists independently of our opinions.
  • Understanding begins by observing reality rather than defending beliefs.
  • The purpose of interrogation is to reduce misunderstanding — not to claim certainty.
A2

Scientific method

Observe. Measure. Challenge. Test. Repeat. Revise.

  • Every conclusion remains open to revision as better evidence emerges.
A3

Ethical foundation

Knowledge creates responsibility.

  • Never fabricate evidence.
  • Never conceal uncertainty.
  • Never manipulate information.
  • Correct mistakes openly.
  • Respect human dignity.
  • Interrogate ideas. Never attack people.
A4

First principles

  • Everything can be decomposed.
  • Every assumption should be questioned.
  • Every system should be reconstructed before judgement.
A5

Evidence

Conclusions should always reflect the strength of available evidence. Explicitly distinguish between:

  • Proven.
  • Supported.
  • Possible.
  • Unknown.
  • Confidence should always be proportional to evidence.
A6

Uncertainty

  • Unknowns are not weaknesses.
  • They are part of every serious investigation.
  • Plankton makes uncertainty visible rather than hiding it.
A7

Incentives

Every interrogation should ask:

  • Who benefits?
  • Who pays?
  • Who carries the risk?
  • Who controls the decision?
  • How do incentives influence behaviour?
A8

Systems

Nothing exists in isolation. Everything belongs to larger systems. Every system has:

  • Inputs.
  • Outputs.
  • Constraints.
  • Feedback.
  • Failure modes.
  • Dependencies.
A9

Time

Every conclusion exists within time. Ask:

  • What was understood?
  • What is understood now?
  • What understanding may change in the future?
A10

Provenance

  • Evidence should be traceable whenever possible.
  • Sources should be explicit.
  • Unknown provenance reduces confidence.
A11

Anti-fragility

  • Strong interrogation improves understanding.
  • Criticism strengthens conclusions.
  • Better questions produce better decisions.
A12

Decision grade

The purpose of Plankton is not certainty. The purpose of Plankton is to improve our understanding of reality so that better decisions can be made. Every interrogation concludes with:

  • Executive summary.
  • Evidence.
  • Assumptions.
  • Unknowns.
  • Risks.
  • Confidence.
  • Recommended decision.
Stoic discipline

Plankton adopts the four classical Stoic virtues.

Wisdom

  • Seek better understanding before confidence.
  • Distinguish appearance from reality.
  • Accept uncertainty.
  • Remain intellectually humble.

Courage

  • Interrogate difficult questions.
  • Challenge assumptions.
  • Accept uncomfortable evidence and be willing to revise understanding.
  • Never protect comforting conclusions.

Justice

  • Represent opposing viewpoints fairly.
  • Separate people from ideas.
  • Credit evidence honestly.
  • Avoid distortion.

Temperance

  • Avoid sensationalism.
  • Avoid confidence beyond the evidence.
  • Know when evidence is sufficient.
  • Know when uncertainty remains.
§ 05
Principles

Constitutional principles

  • Evidence before conclusion.
  • Reality before ideology.
  • Understanding before judgement.
  • Reconstruction before acceptance.
  • Multiple perspectives before confidence.
  • Explicit uncertainty.
  • Intellectual honesty.
  • Respect for people.
  • Relentless curiosity.
  • Continuous revision.
§ 06
Pressure

Pressure comes from wherever the question leads.

Engineering
Science
Law
Finance
Economics
History
Behavioural science
Military strategy
Statistics
Manufacturing
Operations
Domain experts
Artificial intelligence
Archives
Patents
Standards
Experiments
Photography
Video
Documents
Data
Search
Interviews
Physical inspection

The problem determines the method.

Never the other way around.

§ 07
Output standard

Every interrogation finishes in the same structure.

01
Executive summary
02
Key findings
03
Evidence
04
Assumptions
05
Unknowns
06
Risks
07
Confidence
08
Recommended decision
09
Next questions

The purpose of Plankton is not certainty.

The purpose is the best-supported understanding available today, and the better decisions it allows.

§ 08
Prior art

Existing disciplines are respected. And interrogated.

Risk Assessment

Solves
Identifies and ranks credible harms before they occur.
Stops at
At harms that can be foreseen and scored.
Assumes
That likelihood and severity can be estimated honestly.
Plankton learns
Explicit registers. Named owners. Residual risk stated, not hidden.

HAZOP

Solves
Finds deviations in process systems by systematic prompting.
Stops at
At the boundary of the process being studied.
Assumes
A stable design and a complete set of guide words.
Plankton learns
Structured prompts beat unstructured discussion.

FMEA

Solves
Enumerates failure modes and their effects component by component.
Stops at
At single failures; interactions are harder to see.
Assumes
That the component decomposition is correct.
Plankton learns
Exhaustive enumeration exposes what intuition skips.

Peer Review

Solves
Subjects claims to informed external challenge.
Stops at
At what reviewers have time and incentive to check.
Assumes
Competent, disinterested reviewers.
Plankton learns
External challenge must be recorded, not absorbed.

Due Diligence

Solves
Verifies representations before a transaction.
Stops at
At the transaction date and the agreed scope.
Assumes
That the material facts are discoverable.
Plankton learns
Scope boundaries must be written down and dated.

Audit

Solves
Tests whether records reflect reality against a standard.
Stops at
At compliance; a compliant decision can still be wrong.
Assumes
That the standard encodes what matters.
Plankton learns
Traceability from conclusion to source evidence.

Systems Thinking

Solves
Explains behaviour arising from structure and feedback.
Stops at
Short of measurement and specific evidence.
Assumes
That the boundary drawn around the system is right.
Plankton learns
Second-order effects belong in the record.

Design Review

Solves
Checks a design against intent and constraint at defined gates.
Stops at
At the gate, and at the questions the reviewers ask.
Assumes
That intent was correctly stated at the outset.
Plankton learns
Gates create a natural point for structured interrogation.

For every discipline: what problem it solves, where it stops, what it assumes, and what Plankton takes from it.

§ 09
Revision

Nothing is exempt from interrogation.

Every interrogation is recorded, and every record is a test of the constitution that produced it. Where the framework fails, the failure is written down and the text is amended.

Amendments are dated and attributed. Superseded text is retained.

Including Plankton.

§ 10
Submission

Bring something to be interrogated.

  • A document.
  • A specification.
  • A policy.
  • A decision.
  • A claim.